Thursday, May 15, 2008

The Housing Crises is Over!

The GREAT article below from the Wall Street Journal discusses exactly what I was saying in Monday’s posting. Our team was selling Real Estate in the ‘70s, ’80’s, and 90’s and have experienced this before. We feel the inventory is dropping and will substantially drop in 2009 which will drive prices back up.

 

The dire headlines coming fast and furious in the financial and popular press suggest that the housing crisis is intensifying. Yet it is very likely that April 2008 will mark the bottom of the U.S. housing market. Yes, the housing market is bottoming right now.

How can this be? For starters, a bottom does not mean that prices are about to return to the heady days of 2005. That probably won't happen for another 15 years. It just means that the trend is no longer getting worse, which is the critical factor.

Most people forget that the current housing bust is nearly three years old. Home sales peaked in July 2005. New home sales are down a staggering 63% from peak levels of 1.4 million. Housing starts have fallen more than 50% and, adjusted for population growth, are back to the trough levels of 1982.

Furthermore, residential construction is close to 15-year lows at 3.8% of GDP; by the fourth quarter of this year, it will probably hit the lowest level ever.

So what's going to stop the housing decline? Very simply, the same thing that caused the bust: affordability.

The boom made housing unaffordable for many American families, especially first-time home buyers. During the 1990s and early 2000s, it took 19% of average monthly income to service a conforming mortgage on the average home purchased. By 2005 and 2006, it was absorbing 25% of monthly income. For first time buyers, it went from 29% of income to 37%. That just proved to be too much.

Since then, house prices have fallen 10%-15%, while incomes have kept growing (albeit more slowly recently) and mortgage rates have come down 70 basis points from their highs. As a result, it now takes 19% of monthly income for the average home buyer, and 31% of monthly income for the first-time home buyer, to purchase a house.

In other words, homes on average are back to being as affordable as during the best of times in the 1990s.The next question is: Even if home sales pick up, how can home prices stop falling with so many houses vacant and unsold? The flip but true answer: because they always do.

In the past five major housing market corrections every time home sales bottomed, the pace of house-price declines halved within one or two months.

The explanation is that by the time home sales stop declining, inventories of unsold homes have usually already started falling in absolute terms and begin to peak out in "months of supply" terms.

That's the case right now: New home inventories peaked at 598,000 homes in July 2006, and stand at 482,000 homes as of the end of March. This inventory is equivalent to 11 months of supply, a 25-year high – but it is similar to 1974, 1982 and 1991 levels, which saw a subsequent slowing in home-price declines within the next six months.

Inventories are declining because construction activity has been falling for such a long time that home completions are now just about undershooting new home sales. In a few months, completions of new homes for sale could be undershooting new home sales by 50,000-100,000 annually. Inventories will drop even faster to 400,000 – or seven months of supply – by the end of 2008.

This shift in inventories will have a significant impact on prices, although house prices won't stop falling entirely until inventories reach five months of supply sometime in 2009. A five-month supply has historically signaled tightness in the housing market.

Many pundits claim that house prices need to fall another 30% to bring them back in line with where they've been historically. This is usually based on an analysis of house prices adjusted for inflation: Real house prices are 30% above their 40-year, inflation-adjusted average, so they must fall 30%. This simplistic analysis is appealing on the surface, but is flawed for a variety of reasons.

Most importantly, it neglects the fact that a great majority of Americans buy their houses with mortgages. And if one buys a house with a mortgage, the most important factor in deciding what to pay for the house is how much of one's income is required to be able to make the mortgage payments on the house. Today the rate on a 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage is 5.7%. Back in 1981, the rate hit 18.5%. Comparing today's house prices to the 1970s or 1980s, when mortgage rates were stratospheric, is misguided and misleading.

This is all good news for the broader economy. The housing bust has been subtracting a full percentage point from GDP for almost two years now, which is very large for a sector that represents less than 5% of economic activity...

The odds are that the reverberations will lead to subtrend growth for a couple of years. Nonetheless, housing led us into this credit crisis and this recession. It is likely to lead us out. And that process is underway, right now.

 

By CYRIL MOULLE-BERTEAUX

Managing Partner Traxis Partners, LP,

a hedge fund firm based in New York

Wall Street Journal Blog

May 6, 2008

 

 

______________________________________________________

Alyssa Duggan

Real Estate Broker

 

The Duggan Group Corporation

The Duggan Team

Convenience. Experience. Results.

 

231 Marketplace ste. 344
San Ramon CA 94583

 

650.678.5050 cell

925.806.9126 office

925.406.0925 e-fax

www.DugganTeam.com

 

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Have we Hit Bottom Yet in the Housing Market?

Have we hit bottom yet in the Housing Market? Isn’t that the million dollar question and one that our team gets asked daily!

 

As you can see from the last posting, prices in March across the Bay Area are way down when compared to March of 2007. It looks like we may be nearing the bottom. Why do I say that? For 2 reasons, first inventory levels are beginning to decline. The Altos 10-City Composite Index was down 1.7% for the first quarter of 2008, with most of the decline occurring in March (1.3%). The index tracks homes for sale in 23 metros through real-time listing prices. The largest decline was in San Francisco. The number of days the homes stay on the market also declined. This makes perfect sense…with low prices; homes are going faster and not staying on the market as long. With less homes coming on the market, inventory levels are also going down.

 

The second reason is the increase of liquidity into the market with 360 Billion dollars in fresh capital injected into the market by the feds (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal home loan banks). Investors are now able to sell their mortgage bond holdings and get liquidity back into the market. Basically the feds have “primed the pump”. Once liquidity is back, there are more home loans for buyers and more homes sell as a result.

 

With inventory levels going down substantially each month and more loans available; prices go up. This is all good news for sellers and a great time to buy for buyers. It looks like we are nearing the bottom. The problem is we will only know we were at the bottom when prices go up. This is a risk that many buyers are willing to take.

 

______________________________________________________

Alyssa Duggan

Real Estate Broker

 

The Duggan Group Corporation

The Duggan Team

Convenience. Experience. Results.

 

231 Marketplace ste. 344
San Ramon CA 94583

 

650.678.5050 cell

925.806.9126 office

925.406.0925 e-fax

www.DugganTeam.com

 

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Do you want to know the March housing prices and number of sold?

Here are March 2008 housing prices for Alameda and Contra Costa County by City. The chart includes March 2008 and compares it to March 2007; giving you the % of change. Berkeley and San Ramon were the only two cities to experience positive growth in price. For additional Bay Area cities, please call or email me.